Most companies rely on software to increase employee productivity and overall business efficiency. The reality is that it is relatively easy for a company to get un conceded software. Many employees unknowingly use unauthorized software and some do not even know that it is illegal to use and copy software that the company has not authorized. In the case of SaaS programs that provide functionality and data, the data provided by the provider to users is protected by law, as well as the data provided, and only authorized users with valid SaaS agreements can access it at any time. Legal penalties are much harsher when people or companies are caught in the act of selling illegal software. They may be required to pay fines of up to $250,000 and face up to five years in prison. In addition, there will be a permanent crime on their record. To avoid involuntary (or advertising) data theft by abusing software, follow these tips: In the United States, copyright laws categorize software piracy into three main categories. Offences in each category can be prosecuted. When using software publishers and copyright owners, it is important to know if you have a license for the use of their copyrighted works. Users should also know what terms, conditions, terms, scope of the license and what agreements are entered into in the license agreement.
A violation of the AEA could trigger a software audit or lead to a federal action citing deliberate copyright infringements or violations of the AEA. This blog explains these concepts. A common criticism of end-user licensing contracts is that they are often far too long for users to spend time reading them carefully. In March 2012, the PayPal end-user license agreement was 36,275 words and in May 2011, the iTunes agreement was 56 pages long.  The sources of information that reported these results stated that the vast majority of users do not read the documents because of their length. The 7th. And the 8th circuit subscribe to the argument “licensed and not sold”, when most other circuits are not necessary. In addition, the applicability of contracts depends on the adoption by the state of the laws of uniformity of transactions on computer information (UCITA) or the anti-UCITA (U-BombATION Shelter) Act. In the anti-UCITA states, the Single Code of Commerce (UCC) has been amended to explicitly define the software as a good (which places it in the UCC), i.e. to prohibit contracts that stipulate that the terms of the contract are governed by the laws of a state that existed in DIE UCITA. Violations are often reported by employees, other users, competitors and creditors. In addition, software companies monitor users` connections and their use of software to validate the license, access and use of compliance.
Indeed, many SaaS agreements explain how the company will monitor and review the use and how violations of the agreement will be enforced. If you sign an agreement with a saaS supplier, it is important that you read it and respect it completely. This includes everything in the licensing or access clause, as well as all the restrictions contained in the prohibited uses clause of the agreement. It is your responsibility to respect your obligations under the Treaty. Some copyright holders use EULAs to circumvent existing copyright restrictions (. For example, restrictions in sections 107-122 of the United States Copyright Act) or to extend control over work to areas where copyright protection is denied by law (e.g. B, the attempt to impose private representations of a work beyond a certain number of performances or beyond a certain period). , to regulate or prevent.